Profanity: Still an ugly habit


On Jon Stewart’s “The Daily Show” a few weeks ago, guest Bill Cosby reprimanded the host for the use of profanity during a benefit show. Saying that he grew up in a time when swearing was taboo, Cosby said, “See, now there’s a whole new culture. People curse and they laugh. But for me, when you were cursing, I started crying.” It was a surprising moment, especially for Jon Stewart, who seemed genuinely shocked that Cosby was not joking. Apparently he was too surprised to apologize, even though Cosby went on to say that he had felt uncomfortable during the benefit show, at which he had also performed (without swearing).

Stewart’s attitude reflects more on our culture than on Stewart himself. The use of profanity on television has almost doubled since 2005, and the most offensive words have seen the biggest rises in popularity. The internet, of course, is even more profane. Curse words are not only used by louts anymore, nor are they used only to express anger. If this were the case, there would be few curmudgeons about the issue. The trouble is that profanity has become casual and frequent. While overuse has dulled the immediate impact of profane words, it has also caused the existing vulgarity to invade places previously safe from it—popular culture, retail settings and school classrooms perhaps included.

The milder oaths of the English language have been left behind, at least in the new social media. Few young participants in our popular non-culture would feel themselves sufficiently uncaring if they used the more traditional curse words; the ones which after all could still be found in the Bible. In North America, there are really only three profanities: the curse that originally referred to defecation, the curse that once referred to dogs and now offensively to women, and the curse that refers to a sexual act; each along with its own variants.

The third curse, which I would rather not repeat, and which I need not write for the benefit of anyone’s curiosity, epitomizes the culture of profanity. It performs no unique and useful lexical function—that is, any legitimate meanings intended by its use could be communicated otherwise. Unlike almost every other word, it has no power to uplift the human heart or inspire it to noble thoughts. It is the most common denominator, and it is above no one. Unlike many words of inspiration and virtue, you can be essentially certain, if you ever need to guess, that you will hear this sordid word in the conversations of the violent, the depraved and the dishonourable. It is a hallmark of degeneracy.

This term carries a connotation of violent sexuality, as any historian of the word would agree. As a matter of fact, its history is totally chauvinistic. It has survived throughout the centuries, for the most part, thanks to men; men who did not think much of the dignity of women. There is actually a song, released this year, whose title is a combination of two curse words: the one we are discussing, and the one referring to a woman, the oaths separated only by a pronoun. The meaning of the title is “(Violently) have sex with that (worthless) woman”. This is extreme indecency and hostility toward women, but these words are not above these sorts of messages; they were designed for it.

This is not to say that everyone who uses profanity does so in the worst sense. It is true that curse words are now most often used and interpreted as an expression of emphasis as opposed to viciousness. But the emphasis itself arises from the lingering taboo, the still-offensive vulgarity of the oath. In any case, the fact that an obscenity’s emotional force has been diluted by repeated use is no recommendation of it, let alone of the culture that embraces it. Any messages worth communicating would survive the death of this disgusting word, so long as people can find cleverer ways to express emphasis and emotion, and any messages that would not survive do not deserve to. There is still something to be said for beauty in the world, and obscenities cannot say it.

As it so often does, our society has progressed in some ways and regressed in others. While profanity has in many ways gotten worse, we have collectively chosen to stigmatize racial slurs and divisive language, recognizing that language shapes our world and our views. We gave up those words for the sake of goodwill and unity. Let us give up the rest of our linguistic vices for the sake of beauty, honour and virtue.

Update: A video of the Stewart-Cosby interview can be found here for viewers in the US and here for viewers in Canada.

7 thoughts on “Profanity: Still an ugly habit

  1. “As it so often does, our society has progressed in some ways and regressed in others. While profanity has in many ways gotten worse, we have collectively chosen to stigmatize racial slurs and divisive language, recognizing that language shapes our world and our views”

    I do agree to a point….but two of the three most commonly used curse words you’ve mentioned are meant to be and/or have their roots in being duragatory towards females…so just because we’ve chosen not to “stigmatize” other races – we’ve gotten quite comfortable doing it towards women – so much so that the second word on your list is allowable on primetime TV….why don’t we view this word as we do the now taboo racial slur that targets black people? Both are meant to bring down, debase, and humiliate a segment of the population. How did one fall into the “do not use” territory (and rightly so) but the other become a daily, commonplace term?? Just curious…..

    • You’re right, we haven’t stigmatized every sort of divisive language. My point was just that we’ve stopped using certain offensive words, and that we should be willing to do the same for the rest of them. As far as why that hasn’t happened, I’m only guessing, but I think that the curses I’ve mentioned are more subtle in their prejudice than racial slurs are, and also that racism is seen as an nastier thing than sexism in our culture.

  2. The thing about language is that it is constantly evolving. Words that were considered inappropriate or bad centuries ago, are common place today. The word “bad” itself used to be a derogatory term for an effeminate man. The words which we today consider vulgar are simply shifting into the common place category and will probably be replaced with other words. It’s simply the natural order of a society.

    • I agree with you in principle. The word itself is not the problem, because any other word with equivalent meaning and connotation would be as offensive (of course). And you’re right, that words will always be created to fill meanings that people want to use.

      Where I disagree with you in practice is whether people will always want to keep the meanings behind these particular words. I don’t think they necessarily will. For example, racial slurs used to be part of our culture much more than they are today. We haven’t replaced the slur that is most offensive to black people, for example, and with luck we never will. I think if all of us decide we don’t want to use such ugly language (as the three words in my article), we won’t. We won’t listen to songs with titles so offensive to women as the one I mentioned, because we won’t ever want to say such awful things. We won’t have need for these words.

      However, I’ll agree that I don’t think cursing will ever disappear. What I hope is that it will be less pervasive than it is today, which I don’t think is unrealistic, given how bizarrely (hopefully anomalously) popular swearing has gotten lately.

  3. Pingback: Bugging Me: Automated Profanity Filters | Side Quest Publications

  4. Pingback: Why The Eff I like Vulgar words now?? | Daniel Azwan

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s